Contact: +91-9711224068
International Journal of Applied Research
  • Multidisciplinary Journal
  • Printed Journal
  • Indexed Journal
  • Refereed Journal
  • Peer Reviewed Journal

ISSN Print: 2394-7500, ISSN Online: 2394-5869, CODEN: IJARPF

IMPACT FACTOR (RJIF): 8.4

Vol. 2, Issue 6, Part B (2016)

Prediction of maximum oxygen uptake via twelve minutes run and walk test of pre-orientated in opposition to randomized athletes: A comparative study

Prediction of maximum oxygen uptake via twelve minutes run and walk test of pre-orientated in opposition to randomized athletes: A comparative study

Author(s)
Pandey Gayatri, Dr. Pandey Vivek and Dr. Pathak Anju
Abstract
Oxygen is the most critical component for running at fast pace or long duration workout, the aim of present investigation was to find out the consequence of pre-orientation in opposition to randomization of subjects for the prediction of maximum oxygen uptake via twelve minutes run and walk test. For the study thirty athletes of 19 to 23 years with a mean and SD of 20.83 ± 1.17 from L.N.I.P.E., Gwalior (M.P.) selected as subjects; subjects performed the 12-MRT in three variants: performing alone the 12-MRT on a 400 m track (Alone-V1); performing 12-MRT on a 400 m track in randomized groups of three (R-Group, V2); performing 12-MRT on a 400 m track in pre-oriented groups of three the (PO-Group, V3). To determine the difference of predicted VO2 max among different groups the repeated measure analysis of variance (ANOVA) was employed and the significant level was set at 0.05. The significant difference (p>0.05) was found in calculated VO2 max among testing protocol. The result of this study shows significance differences between V1 & V2, V1 & V3 and V2 & V3, which gives an idea that running in a group improves the VO2 max performance of athletes.
Pages: 107-110  |  1121 Views  73 Downloads
How to cite this article:
Pandey Gayatri, Dr. Pandey Vivek, Dr. Pathak Anju. Prediction of maximum oxygen uptake via twelve minutes run and walk test of pre-orientated in opposition to randomized athletes: A comparative study. Int J Appl Res 2016;2(6):107-110.
Call for book chapter
International Journal of Applied Research
Journals List Click Here Research Journals Research Journals