Vol. 10, Issue 4, Part A (2024)

Abstract
This research paper delves into the operational dynamics of the Juvenile Justice Care and Protection Act of 2015, with a specific focus on the functioning of Juvenile Justice Boards (JJBs), using the Juvenile Justice Board of Pilibhit as a case study. The Juvenile Justice Care and Protection Act of 2015 was enacted to ensure the protection, care, and rehabilitation of juveniles in conflict with the law. The study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining qualitative interviews with stakeholders and quantitative analysis of case data from the Juvenile Justice Board of Pilibhit. The paper first provides an overview of the legal framework established by the Juvenile Justice Care and Protection Act of 2015, outlining its key provisions and objectives. It then examines the structure and functions of Juvenile Justice Boards, highlighting their role in adjudicating cases involving juveniles in conflict with the law and determining appropriate measures for their rehabilitation and reintegration into society. Drawing on interviews with members of the Juvenile Justice Board, social workers, legal practitioners, and other stakeholders, the paper analyzes the operational challenges faced by the Juvenile Justice Board of Pilibhit. These challenges include issues related to infrastructure, staffing, procedural delays, and coordination with other agencies involved in juvenile welfare and rehabilitation. Furthermore, the study assesses the effectiveness of rehabilitation programs implemented by the Juvenile Justice Board of Pilibhit and identifies areas for improvement. It also explores the perceptions and experiences of juveniles who have come into contact with the justice system, shedding light on their needs, experiences, and aspirations. The findings of this research contribute to a deeper understanding of the implementation of juvenile justice laws at the grassroots level and provide insights into the challenges and opportunities for enhancing the effectiveness of juvenile justice systems. The paper concludes with recommendations for policymakers, practitioners, and civil society actors to strengthen the juvenile justice system, with a view to promoting the rights and well-being of juveniles in conflict with the law.