Exploring differences and similarities: A comparative analysis of International sports federations (ISFS) and national sports federations (NSFS)
Exploring differences and similarities: A comparative analysis of International sports federations (ISFS) and national sports federations (NSFS)
Author(s)
Yatendra Kumar Sharma and Dr. Ashok Kumar Singh
Abstract
Sports federations are responsible for managing and governing sports activities. They play a critical role in the development and promotion of sports by providing infrastructure, training facilities, coaching, and financial support to athletes. International Sports Federations (ISFs) and National Sports Federations (NSFs) are the two main types of sports federations, with ISFs overseeing and organizing sports activities at the international level, and NSFs responsible for the same at the national level. This research presents a comparative study between ISFs and NSFs in India, focusing on their organizational structure, governance, funding, and role in sports development. The study aims to analyze and compare the differences between the two types of federations National and International, and understand their respective roles in promoting sports development. A qualitative research design was used to collect data through a review of relevant literature and documents, from key stakeholders, such as Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports, ISFs and NSFs, and sports experts. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data collected. The study found significant differences between ISFs and NSFs in terms of their organizational structure, governance, funding, and role in sports development. ISFs are international bodies that are governed by a democratically elected Executive Board responsible for overseeing sports activities at the international level. In contrast, NSFs are national bodies governed by an elected Executive Committee responsible for organizing sports activities at the national level. ISFs play a crucial role in funding and promoting sports development in India by providing financial support, infrastructure, training facilities, and coaching to athletes. Meanwhile, NSFs also play a significant role in sports development by organizing national level competitions, identifying and nurturing talent, and promoting sports at the grassroots level. In conclusion, this study highlights the significant differences between ISFs and NSFs in India in terms of their organizational structure, governance, funding, and role in sports development. The study emphasizes the importance of a collaborative approach between the two types of federations to achieve the common goal of promoting sports in the country. The study's findings provide valuable insights for policymakers, sports organizations, and stakeholders to promote sports development effectively in India.