Vol. 11, Issue 4, Part B (2025)

Results: The method adopted for the present study was prospective comparative approach as the study aimed to comparison of transvaginal USG and hysteroscopy as diagnostic modalities evaluation in abnormal uterine bleeding among women. 60 women with abnormal uterine bleeding using nonprobability convenience sampling technique. Data collected by evaluation Scale. Prospective comparative research design, the study was conducted at selected hospital of Udaipur, Rajasthan. Both transvaginal USG and hysteroscopy were accurate an abnormality was diagnosed giving a specificity of 68.96% & 82.14% and positive predictive value of 72.33% & 84.84%. The ability to diagnose a lesion (sensitivity) was more with hysteroscopy in comparison to transveginal USG (87.5% v/s 77.41%), while a negative diagnosis was less wrongly made with hysteroscopy (false negative rate: 12.5% v/s 22.58%). Out of 60 patients tested 32 patients normal findings, 28 patients had abnormal findings, out of which 5 (8.3) cases had endometrial polyp and Submucos myoma, 13 (21.7) cases had hyperplasia, 4 (6.7) cases had endometrial atrophy and 1(4.7) cases had irregular shedding pattern of endometrium. This indicates there is significant association in experimental group and not significant association in control group. Hence research hypothesis H₁ was accepted. The main focus of the study was to Comparison of transvaginal USG and hysteroscopy as diagnostic modalities evaluation in abnormal uterine bleeding among women.

Conclusion: In the present study 60 women’s were selected through nonprobability convenient sampling technique. Researcher used Prospective comparative design to diagnostic value during abnormal uterine bleeding were collected through evolution scale and data were analysed through suitable statistical method.